Module Database Search



MODULE DESCRIPTOR
Module Title
Arbitration Law
Reference BSM601 Version 9
Created May 2019 SCQF Level SCQF 11
Approved August 2019 SCQF Points 15
Amended August 2019 ECTS Points 7.5

Aims of Module
To provide students with an in-depth knowledge and comparative understanding of UK and international arbitration law. To convey a deep understanding of the isues that can arise in cross-border arbitrations. To consider some of the key arbitral rules. To understand the specific features of oral advocacy in arbitration. To understand in outline some of the alternatives to arbitration.

Learning Outcomes for Module
On completion of this module, students are expected to be able to:
1 Discuss in depth the basic structure of the arbitral regimes in the UK and in other key jurisdictions.
2 Evaluate and explain the main issues that arise out of arbitrations with a cross-border element.
3 Critically analyse the various institutional and ad hoc rules available for the conduct of UK and international arbitrations.
4 Develop skills of oral advocacy including presentation skills, addressing the tribunal in an appropriate and professional manner.
5 Critically analyse the diverse non-arbitral methods of commercial dispute resolution.

Indicative Module Content
UK arbitral law from appointment of arbitrator to enforcement of award; similar arbitral law in selected jurisdictions; international private law (choice of law, recognition and enforcement of decrees and awards and jurisdiction); overview of non-arbitral dispute resolution methods; overview of UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 as amended; overview of selected arbitral rules.

Module Delivery
This course will be taught via online lecture notes, online tutorials, assigned reading and exercises, case studies and directed reading/research.

Indicative Student Workload Full Time Part Time
Contact Hours N/A 50
Non-Contact Hours N/A 100
Placement/Work-Based Learning Experience [Notional] Hours N/A N/A
TOTAL N/A 150
Actual Placement hours for professional, statutory or regulatory body    

ASSESSMENT PLAN
If a major/minor model is used and box is ticked, % weightings below are indicative only.
Component 1
Type: Coursework Weighting: 70% Outcomes Assessed: 1, 2, 3
Description: A coursework exercise worth 70% of the overall mark.
Component 2
Type: Examination Weighting: 15% Outcomes Assessed: 1, 5
Description: Made up of three multiple choice quizzes making up 15% of the overall mark.
Component 3
Type: Practical Exam Weighting: 15% Outcomes Assessed: 2, 3, 4
Description: An oral presentation to be submitted online comprising 15% on the overall mark.

MODULE PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTOR
Explanatory Text
The Module is assessed by three components: C1 - Coursework - 70% weighting. C2 - Multiple Choice Questions - 15% weighting. C3 - Oral Presentation - 15% weighting. Module Pass Mark = Grade D (40%).
Module Grade Minimum Requirements to achieve Module Grade:
A At least 70% on weighted aggregate and at least 35% in each component
B At least 60% on weighted aggregate and at least 35% in each component
C At least 50% on weighted aggregate and at least 35% in each component
D At least 40% on weighted aggregate and at least 35% in each component
E At least 35% on weighted aggregate
F Less than 35% on weighted aggregate
NS Non-submission of work by published deadline or non-attendance for examination

Module Requirements
Prerequisites for Module None.
Corequisites for module None.
Precluded Modules None.

ADDITIONAL NOTES
None.

INDICATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY
1 BLACKABY, N. and PARTASIDES, C., 2015 Redfern and Hunter on internationl arbitration - student version 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2 BROWN, H. and MARRIOT, A., 2011. ADR Principles and practice. 3rd ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
3 HARRIS, B., PLANTEROSE R. and TECKS, J., 2014. Arbitration act 1996. 5th ed. London: Blackstone Press.
4 LEW, J.D.M., MISTELIS, L.A. and KROLL, S.M., 2003. Comparative international commercial arbitration. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
5 SUTTON, J.D., GILL, J., et al 2014. Russell on arbitration. 24th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.


Robert Gordon University, Garthdee House, Aberdeen, AB10 7QB, Scotland, UK: a Scottish charity, registration No. SC013781